Correcting for spatially dependent intrinsic efficiency on a germanium double-sided strip detector to improve nuclear forensics response

Timothy Jacomb-Hood; James Fast; Craig M. Marianno

doi:10.1007/s41605-021-00297-y

Volume 6 Issue 1

Mar. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Radiation Detection Technology and Methods > 2022 > 6(1): 78-87 > doi: 10.1007/s41605-021-00297-y CSTR: 32043.14.s41605-021-00297-y

PDF (4084 KB)

Correcting for spatially dependent intrinsic efficiency on a germanium double-sided strip detector to improve nuclear forensics response

1. Department of Nuclear Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA;
2. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA

More Information

Received Date: June 13, 2021
Revised Date: October 28, 2021
Accepted Date: October 30, 2021
Available Online: October 17, 2022
Published Date: December 01, 2021

Abstract

Abstract

Purpose The Germanium Gamma-ray Imager (GeGI) is a planar high-purity germanium (HPGe) imaging detector developed by PHDS Co for far-field imaging. This research investigates the detector’s ability for measuring heterogeneous sources in the near field, placed directly on the detector’s faceplate, to perform isotopic mapping for nuclear forensic missions.
Methods The intrinsic efficiency is strongly dependent on where the photons interact within the germanium. The efficiency varies by up to 20% within the sensitive volume of the detector. The efficiency was mapped using eight different photons from 123 to 1274 keV emitted from a collimated ¹⁵⁴Eu photons. These were measured at 108 locations to interpolate the efficiency at any point on the detector’s face.
Results The position and energy dependence are uncorrelated, and thus, the absolute efficiency at any position and for any gamma-ray energy can be calculated by the convolution of the spatial and energy efficiencies.
Conclusion The results on this research show that detection efficiency for a planar two-sided strip HPGe is spatially dependent and shows typical energy dependence. The spatial dependence, which does not have any additional energy dependence, can be corrected. A ¹⁵⁴Eu source was used in this research and was able to spatially calibrate for photon energies ranging from 100 to 1300 keV. This method is applicable for sources with higher gamma energies. The advantages of the method demonstrated that after initial in-laboratory calibration, a single measurement in the field can be used to efficiently calibrate the HPGe as a function of photon interaction on the crystal.
- Nuclear forensics,
- Radiation detection,
- Gamma-ray imaging

FullText(HTML)

References (13)

References

[1]	R.C. Runkle, L.E. Smith, A.J. Peurrung, "The photon haystack and emerging radiation detection technology, (in English). J. Appl. Phys. 106 (4), 041101 (2009)
[2]	Nuclear Forensics and Attribution Act. One Hundred Eleventh Congress of the United States of America (2010)
[3]	T. W. Jacomb-Hood, S. E. Sarnoski, J. Fast, C. M. Marianno, Quantification of spatially variant efficiency in an orthogonal strip detector, in Nuclear Materials Science, Processing and Signature Discovery Workshop, Richland, Washington (2018).
[4]	G.F. Knoll, Radiation Detection and Measurement, 4th edn. (Wiley, Hoboken, 2010)
[5]	M. Amman, P. N. Luke, Three-dimensional position sensing and field shaping in orthogonal-strip germanium gamma-ray detectors, (in English). Nucl. Inst. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip. 452(1–2), pp. 155–166, (2000).
[6]	R. P. Parker, E. M. Gunnersen, J. L. Wankling, R. Ellis, A semiconductor gamma camera with quantitative output. preliminary results, in Symposium on Medical Radioisotope Scintigraphy, Salzburg, Austria, pp. 71–85 (1968)
[7]	L.S. Varnell et al., A position-sensitive germanium detector for gamma-ray astronomy, (in English). IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 31 (1), 300–306 (1984)
[8]	R. A. Kroeger, W. N. Johnson, J. D. Kurfess, and B. F. Phlips, "Gamma ray polarimetry using a position sensitive germanium detector, (in English). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip., 436(1–2), 165–169, (1999)
[9]	J. H. Lee and C. S. Lee, Polarization sensitivity and efficiency for a planar-type segmented germanium detector as a Compton polarimeter, (in English). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip. 506(1–2), 125–133, (2003)
[10]	A. Khaplanov, S. Tashenov, B. Cederwall, and G. Jaworski, A gamma-ray polarimeter based on a single segmented planar HPGe detector, (in English). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip. 593(3), 459–465, (2008)
[11]	E. Hull, M. Kiser, "Radioactive threat vision via quantitative gamma-ray imaging," in NCT CBRNe USA, Washington D.C., 2016.
[12]	T. W. Jacomb-Hood et al., "Spatially-resolved HPGe gamma-ray spectroscopy of swipe samples," in Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Institute for Nuclear Materials Management (INMM), Indian Wells, California, (2017)
[13]	R. Brun and F. Rademakers, ROOT: An object oriented data analysis framework," (in English), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip. 389(1–2), 81–86, (1997)

Timothy Jacomb-Hood, James Fast, Craig M. Marianno. Correcting for spatially dependent intrinsic efficiency on a germanium double-sided strip detector to improve nuclear forensics response[J]. Radiation Detection Technology and Methods, 2022, 6(1): 78-87. DOI: 10.1007/s41605-021-00297-y

Citation: